From neversetsun@ustc.edu Wed Apr 02 03:58:00 2008 Received: from smtp.ustc.edu.cn ([202.38.64.16] helo=ustc.edu.cn) by stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JgtAa-00055E-LF for yaffs@lists.aleph1.co.uk; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:58:00 +0100 Received: (eyou send program); Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:57:59 +0800 Message-ID: <407105079.08481@ustc.edu.cn> X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: shizheng@mail.ustc.edu.cn Received: from unknown (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (202.38.79.82) by 202.38.64.8 with SMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:57:59 +0800 Message-ID: <47F2F613.1040000@ustc.edu> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:57:23 +0800 From: shizheng User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yaffs@lists.aleph1.co.uk, Charles Manning Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 202.38.64.16 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: neversetsun@ustc.edu X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk) Subject: [Yaffs] yaffs_VerifyCollectedBlock report error X-BeenThere: yaffs@lists.aleph1.co.uk X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of YAFFS NAND flash filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:58:00 -0000 Hi, yaffs_VerifyCollectedBlock reported "Block xxx is in state 4 after gc, should be erased". State 4 means YAFFS_BLOCK_STATE_ALLOCATING, how would this happen? My testing environment is linux 2.6.24.3: |1. modprobe nandsim first_id_byte=0x20 second_id_byte=0xa2 third_id_byte=0x00 fourth_id_byte=0x15| - 64MiB, 2048 bytes page; 2. mount -t yaffs2 -o sync /dev/mtdblock0 /mnt/nand 3. Then I ran postmark under /mnt/nand. The file size is between 512B and 10kB. The file number is 2000. The transactions is 100000. There were totally 312MB read and 336MB written to flash. Have anybody encountered the same question? best wishes, shizheng