From manningc2@actrix.gen.nz Mon Apr 16 22:39:46 2012
Received: from smtp.scorch.co.nz ([27.110.127.199] helo=scorch.co.nz)
	by stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>) id 1SJte9-0008NL-8O
	for yaffs@lists.aleph1.co.uk; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:39:46 +0100
Received: (qmail 715 invoked by uid 453); 16 Apr 2012 21:39:33 -0000
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on scorch.co.nz
Received: from ptr157.scorch.co.nz (HELO linux-dual-head.local)
	(27.110.120.157) by scorch.co.nz (qpsmtpd/0.83) with ESMTP;
	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:39:27 +1200
From: Charles Manning <manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>
To: yaffs@lists.aleph1.co.uk
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:39:16 +1200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <CAJC8qy-ESjJGyzHa0t+XjtQqEO0Tfzozp3nkGiKyDr4G9mA7Yg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJC8qy-ESjJGyzHa0t+XjtQqEO0Tfzozp3nkGiKyDr4G9mA7Yg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201204170939.17116.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 27.110.127.199
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: manningc2@actrix.gen.nz
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,SPF_NEUTRAL
	autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk)
Subject: Re: [Yaffs] when i write flash with yaffs2 i found the bigger
	logical chunk number has a smaller physical chunk number???
X-BeenThere: yaffs@lists.aleph1.co.uk
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of YAFFS NAND flash filesystem <yaffs.lists.aleph1.co.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.aleph1.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/options/yaffs>,
	<mailto:yaffs-request@lists.aleph1.co.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.aleph1.co.uk/lurker/list/yaffs.html>
List-Post: <mailto:yaffs@lists.aleph1.co.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:yaffs-request@lists.aleph1.co.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.aleph1.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yaffs>,
	<mailto:yaffs-request@lists.aleph1.co.uk?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:39:46 -0000

On Monday 16 April 2012 23:11:56 Ezio Zhang wrote:
> when i write flash with yaffs2 i found the bigger logical chunk number has
> a smaller physical chunk number, and the 0# logical chunk number equal to
> the -1# physical chunk number.just as below shows when i try to write 12000
> bytes to the flash which data area is 1984 bytes and oob is 64 bytes as i
> mod the driver.
> logical chunk number : physical chunk number
> 0:-1
> 1:4864
> 2:4865
> 3:4866
> 4:4867
> 5:4869
> 6:4868
> is this corretly?
> ----
> Regards,
> Ezio.

Hello

I cannot understand this question properly. Perhaps you can rewrite it using 
the terminology used in yaffs. For example the tterm "logical chunk number" 
has no meaning in yaffs.

-- Charles